The Core Misunderstanding Behind Sexual Intimacy

Lisa Bilyeu’s conversation with attachment therapist Adam Lane Smith opens with a metaphor that immediately lands – women often finish sex feeling deeply bonded, while men can finish and feel… fine, full, and emotionally unchanged. Not because they don’t care, but because male and female nervous systems are often responding to entirely different biochemical signals. For many women, sex releases oxytocin that strengthens emotional attachment and trust. For many men, sex without emotional safety or relational investment releases dopamine – pleasure without bonding. When those experiences aren’t aligned, both partners walk away confused and hurt.

Why Women Bond Through Sex and Men Often Don’t

Adam explains that women typically don’t engage sexually unless trust already exists, which means sex reinforces an emotional story already underway. Men, however, can have sex without trust and without bonding unless specific conditions are present. Without those conditions, sex becomes a “hamburger” – enjoyable, satisfying in the moment, but not relationally meaningful. The tragedy is that women often interpret the act as mutual connection, while men interpret it as a completed transaction. That gap is where heartbreak quietly begins.

The Four Levels of Safety Women Need Before Bonding

One of the most important frameworks in the episode is Adam’s four levels of safety that must be present before women bond deeply. Physical safety is the baseline – feeling protected and not threatened. Resource safety follows – knowing someone will step up when life collapses. Emotional safety is next – the ability to bring concerns without being punished, mocked, or dismissed. Finally comes bonding safety – knowing you are emotionally irreplaceable, not just convenient. Many relationships stall at the first two levels, creating the illusion of security while emotional and bonding safety quietly erode.

How Men Actually Form Deep Attachment

Contrary to popular belief, men don’t primarily bond through sex or emotional disclosure. They bond through shared problem-solving, teamwork, and loyalty under stress. This is where vasopressin comes into play – the hormone associated with protection, monogamy, and long-term bonding in men. When a man experiences a woman as a trusted ally rather than someone he must perform for or avoid disappointing, attachment deepens. This is why men often feel closest after building something together, solving challenges as a unit, or weathering adversity side by side.

Why Contempt Is the Most Dangerous Red Flag

Adam repeatedly returns to contempt as the clearest early warning sign of relational collapse. Sarcasm, dismissal, mockery, passive aggression, or subtle belittling don’t fade with time – they intensify. While avoidant partners may withdraw due to fear, contempt signals something more corrosive: the shutdown of empathy. Once empathy goes offline, repair becomes nearly impossible. Men with contempt do not “grow out of it.” They grow sharper, colder, and more dangerous emotionally over time.

Affairs, Attachment, and the Baby Effect

The conversation also addresses one of the most painful realities couples face – why affairs often happen during predictable stress windows, especially after the birth of a first child. Men who are already emotionally starved suddenly lose touch, intimacy, and perceived relevance. Women, flooded with oxytocin through caregiving, are emotionally bonded elsewhere. Without intentional systems of connection, both partners retreat into survival mode. Adam emphasizes that betrayal is never justified, but it is often predictable when couples don’t know how to protect bonding safety during life transitions.

Why Honesty After Betrayal Is About Dignity, Not Damage Control

One of the episode’s most powerful moments centers on disclosure after infidelity. Adam rejects the idea that secrecy protects relationships. He frames honesty as a matter of dignity and consent – continuing a relationship while withholding critical truth robs the betrayed partner of agency. Healing, if it’s possible, begins only when truth is restored and responsibility is taken without minimization or manipulation. Anything less compounds the harm.

How Men and Women Talk Past Each Other

Communication breakdowns aren’t usually about unwillingness – they’re about incompatible processing styles. Women often talk to process emotions. Men often listen to solve problems. When those intentions aren’t clarified, women feel dismissed and men feel ineffective. Adam’s simple fix – explicitly stating whether you want listening or solutions – transforms conflict into collaboration. When men know the “problem” is connection, not fixing, they often show up fully.

Respect, Love, and the Missing Language of Men

The episode closes with a powerful truth many couples miss – men need respect the way women need love expressed. Saying “I respect you” isn’t submission or self-erasure. It signals trust in character, ethics, and reliability. For men, respect activates responsibility rather than dominance. Without it, many men quietly withdraw or resign themselves to emotional isolation inside the relationship.

Conclusion

This conversation isn’t about blaming men or women – it’s about translating between nervous systems that were never taught how to connect intentionally. When couples understand how bonding actually works, intimacy stops being confusing and starts becoming collaborative. Real closeness isn’t accidental – it’s built through safety, honesty, teamwork, and respect. That same intentionality is what Thinking of You quietly encourages – creating space for reflection, presence, and connection before distance or misunderstanding takes root.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #AdamLaneSmith, #LisaBilyeu, #WomenOfImpact, #attachmenttheory, #modernrelationships, #emotionalintimacy

The Myth of “Communication Problems”

Dr. Orna Guralnik begins by dismantling one of the most common myths couples bring into therapy — that their main issue is communication. While conflict often shows up through words, tone, or arguments, she explains that communication is rarely the root problem. Instead, it’s the stage where deeper tensions perform. Couples argue about chores, money, sex, or time, but beneath those topics lies something far more uncomfortable: the reality of sharing a life with someone who is genuinely different from you. When couples obsess over “better communication,” they often avoid touching the real emotional material that feels too threatening, painful, or identity-shaking to face directly.

Otherness: The Hidden Source of Conflict

At the core of relationship struggle is what Orna calls otherness — the friction that arises when your partner’s habits, values, upbringing, or emotional rhythms clash with your own. Difference can be exciting and magnetic at first, but over time it becomes intrusive. It challenges how you were raised, how you define yourself, and what feels “right.” When this happens, most people instinctively try to resolve the discomfort by deciding who is correct and who is flawed. This is where conflict hardens into ego battles, moral superiority, and resentment. Instead of saying “we’re different,” couples start asking “what’s wrong with you?” — a shift that quietly poisons intimacy.

How We Turn Difference into Blame

Orna describes how quickly the human mind fills gaps in understanding with stories that protect the self. A simple difference in routine becomes evidence of laziness, disrespect, or selfishness. Over time, these stories become scripts we automatically assign to our partner. This process keeps couples stuck because it feels safer to diagnose the other person than to sit with the discomfort of uncertainty or self-examination. Blame provides clarity — but at the cost of connection. True progress begins when partners loosen their grip on their personal narrative and become curious about what’s happening inside themselves instead of hyper-focusing on what the other is doing wrong.

Why Compromise Isn’t Enough

Rather than aiming for compromise — which often leaves both partners feeling like they’ve lost something — Orna encourages couples to approach conflict as equal partners solving a shared problem. This requires abandoning the idea that one person is entirely right and the other entirely wrong. Healthy couples develop what she calls a “political system” — a way of negotiating difference that prioritizes the health of the relationship as a whole. This approach demands humility, patience, and a willingness to relax deeply held convictions in service of something larger than individual ego.

The Role of Identity, Loyalty, and Family

Many conflicts feel impossible because they threaten core loyalties — to parents, culture, religion, or identity itself. Disagreements about holidays, parenting, or family boundaries often activate fears of betrayal: “If I side with my partner, am I disloyal to where I come from?” Orna emphasizes that these inner conflicts are profoundly uncomfortable and rarely acknowledged. Healing begins when both partners recognize the emotional bind they’re in, rather than rushing toward solutions. Sitting with complexity — without demanding immediate resolution — allows couples to expand their emotional capacity instead of collapsing into defensiveness.

Pop Psychology and the Shortcut to Certainty

Orna also critiques the modern overuse of therapy language like “narcissist,” “gaslighting,” and “love bombing.” While these terms can be useful, they often function as shortcuts to certainty. Once a label is applied, curiosity ends. The problem is externalized, moralized, and sealed. In reality, most relational pain is far more nuanced. Everyone has narcissistic defenses under threat. Everyone withdraws or reacts when they feel unsafe. Labels can bring temporary relief — but they also stop the deeper investigation that leads to growth.

What Actually Makes a Relationship Healthy

A strong relationship isn’t defined by longevity, lack of arguments, or surface harmony. Orna describes healthy couples as having a distinct atmosphere — a felt sense of mutual respect, safety, and goodwill. Conflict exists, but it doesn’t turn into character assassination. These couples allow each other to change over time and don’t demand that their partner remain the person they first fell in love with. Growth is expected, not punished. The relationship bends under pressure instead of breaking — and both partners retain their individuality without turning difference into danger.

The Hardest Question to Ask Yourself

Perhaps the most confronting moment in the conversation comes when Orna offers a question few people ask honestly: Can I give? Can you tolerate someone else’s otherness without trying to control it? Can you hold space for your partner’s growth — even when it’s inconvenient, slow, or challenges your own ego? Love, she argues, isn’t conditional on transformation. No one wants to feel like a project waiting to be completed before the relationship truly begins.

Conclusion

This conversation reframes love not as compatibility perfected, but as difference navigated with humility, curiosity, and care. Relationships don’t fail because partners argue — they fail because difference becomes moralized, weaponized, and personalized. When couples stop trying to fix each other and instead learn how to coexist with otherness, conflict transforms from a threat into a source of depth and connection. That same philosophy lives at the heart of Thinking of You — a reminder that lasting relationships aren’t built through dramatic breakthroughs, but through small, intentional moments of presence that say, “I see you, even when we’re different.”

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #OrnaGuralnik, #JayShetty, #JayShettyPodcast, #couplestherapy, #relationshipgrowth, #emotionalintimacy

The Blueprint Running Your Life

Peter Crone frames human suffering not as a personal failure, but as the result of subconscious blueprints formed early in life. These blueprints – stories about safety, worth, love, and belonging – quietly shape how we relate to ourselves and others. Long after childhood has passed, the nervous system continues to react as if those early conditions are still true. What feels like anxiety, self-doubt, perfectionism, or emotional shutdown is often the body protecting an old narrative. Crone’s central insight is deceptively simple: you are not broken, you’re responding exactly as someone would when living inside a story that once made sense but no longer serves you.

Control Is Fear Wearing a Disguise

A recurring theme in the conversation is control – not as discipline or strength, but as fear attempting to manufacture safety. Crone distinguishes force from power: force tries to manage outcomes, people, and environments to avoid discomfort, while true power comes from being okay regardless of what happens. Control often develops after emotional wounds, disappointment, or instability, becoming a strategy to feel secure. Yet the more someone tries to control, the more fragile they feel inside. Real freedom, Crone suggests, begins when the nervous system learns it is safe without needing everything to go a certain way.

Masculinity, Femininity, and Emotional Safety

Crone challenges rigid ideas of strength that prevent emotional expression, especially for men. When vulnerability is discouraged, feelings don’t disappear – they go underground. Emotional suppression often shows up later as anger, withdrawal, or over-performance. He also notes that emotional safety is relational: men need permission to feel without being judged, just as women need safety to express themselves without fear. Relationships don’t break because of emotions – they break because people don’t feel safe enough to share them. When both partners understand their own conditioning, connection becomes less about performance and more about presence.

Self-Love Isn’t What You’ve Been Sold

One of the most clarifying moments in the episode is Crone’s reframing of self-love. It isn’t indulgence, affirmation, or self-care rituals. Real self-love is the capacity to accept the parts of yourself you’ve labeled unlovable. Judgment, he argues, is the true source of suffering. When someone fixates on superficial traits in others – appearance, status, flaws – it often reveals the same judgment turned inward. The level at which you see others is the level at which you live with yourself. Love becomes possible when self-acceptance replaces self-surveillance.

Triggers Are Not the Enemy

Rather than treating triggers as problems to eliminate, Crone calls them invitations. Life, he says, presents people and circumstances that reveal where you are not yet free. If something provokes a strong emotional reaction, it’s pointing directly to an unresolved story. Most people try to escape these moments through distraction, blame, or avoidance. Crone encourages the opposite – turning toward the discomfort with curiosity. Fear, criticism, rejection, and heartbreak are not signs of failure but guideposts showing exactly where liberation is possible.

Loneliness Isn’t Proof You’re Alone

The emotional heart of the episode emerges when Davina shares her experience of overwhelming loneliness following major surgery. Crone gently traces this pain not to the medical trauma itself, but to a much earlier imprint – a childhood experience of feeling alone and unsupported. His insight lands with precision: loneliness is not the absence of people, but the absence of connection with the part of yourself that can hold you. It feels real, but it is not truth. The moment that part is met with compassion rather than fear, the loneliness dissolves. What heals is not fixing the past, but recognizing the safety that exists now.

Identity Is the Invisible Cage

Crone explains that most people try to change their lives without changing their identity. Whether it’s careers, relationships, geography, or habits, the same patterns repeat because the underlying story remains untouched. Until the narrative of “I’m not enough,” “I’m unsafe,” or “It’s all up to me” is dissolved, external change only rearranges the furniture inside the same small room. Freedom doesn’t come from becoming a better version of a limited self – it comes from questioning the limitation itself.

Conclusion

At its core, this conversation is an invitation to stop fighting yourself. Peter Crone’s work points toward a radical but gentle truth: you already are what you’re searching for. The work is not to earn worth, fix flaws, or outrun fear, but to dissolve the stories that convinced you otherwise. When those stories loosen their grip, relationships soften, control relaxes, and life feels less like something to survive and more like something to inhabit. Practices that encourage reflection, presence, and emotional honesty – like intentional daily check-ins or thoughtful prompts – support this process by helping people reconnect before old narratives take over. Freedom isn’t found at the end of self-improvement; it begins the moment you remember you were never broken to begin with.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #selfworth, #innerhealing, #emotionalfreedom, #subconsciousmind, #healingjourney, #personalgrowth

The Emotional Reality of a Breakup

Mel Robbins and her daughter Sawyer open this conversation with a kind of honesty you rarely hear about heartbreak. Instead of recycling the usual “love yourself” or “move on” clichés, they walk you into the actual emotional architecture of a breakup – the grief, the neurological withdrawal, the fantasy you cling to because letting go feels like losing a part of yourself. Mel frames heartbreak as a form of mourning, not melodrama. Your nervous system has literally wired this person into your routines, your expectations, your sense of safety. So when the relationship ends, the pain you feel is not just sadness but the physical shock of losing something your body still believes is essential. Sawyer illustrates this with the rawness of someone who just lived through it, describing the spiral into obsessive thinking, stalking social media, rereading old messages, and replaying every “what if” to keep the connection alive in her mind. It’s a painfully human instinct, but as they explain, it also stops healing in its tracks because you’re trying to hold onto a life that no longer exists.

Why No-Contact Is More Than a Rule

The heart of this episode is the 30-day no-contact rule – not as a strategy or power move, but as the emotional equivalent of detox. Any form of contact, especially hearing their voice, instantly reactivates the neurological patterns you’re trying to unwind. Mel’s therapist explains that withdrawal isn’t metaphorical; the brain goes into the same loop it experiences when deprived of something it depended on. Sawyer admits she had dozens of impulses every day to reach out, and each one felt like survival rather than attachment. But giving her nervous system that distance created an opening. The fantasy lost a bit of its shine. The panic eased. And even though she eventually made the call on day 30, the space changed her enough to realize closure doesn’t come from the other person but from letting the fantasy die. Mel reframes closure as an internal shift, not a conversation. You’re not seeking peace; you’re seeking reassurance that you don’t want to give yourself. That distinction becomes a quiet turning point: you stop searching for answers from the person who left and start recognizing the question you actually need to ask is whether you’re willing to stop holding on.

Untangling the Fantasy From the Truth

What keeps most people stuck, Sawyer explains, isn’t the loss of the person but the loss of the future they symbolized. You grieve the imagined wedding, the imagined home, the imagined children, the imagined version of yourself who didn’t end up alone. That imagined life becomes a kind of emotional anchor, and even when you accept the breakup logically, you stay bonded to a fantasy that your nervous system treats as real. Mel calls this the part that hurts the most because fantasy dodges accountability. You can’t mourn something that never existed, so you keep feeding it instead. Sawyer realized her deepest resistance wasn’t the relationship ending but accepting that the person she pictured at the end of the aisle simply wasn’t him. That kind of truth is jarring, but it’s also liberating. It’s the moment you recognize that what you miss is the promise, not the partner. And that clarity shifts the entire weight of the grief – it becomes something you can actually carry rather than something dragging you backward. Mel uses this moment to introduce the “let them” framework, not as indifference but as acceptance: let them leave, let them move on, let them become a character in your past instead of a ghost in your present.

Rebuilding Your Life Without Them

The practical side of recovery becomes its own form of compassion. Mel outlines six science-backed tools that help your nervous system adapt to life without the person it once revolved around. Remove triggers. Change your environment. Tell your friends you need them. Fill your calendar with things that pull you back into your body and your world. Choose a new challenge that belongs only to you. Ask yourself who you’d become if you knew the love of your life was 75 days away. These aren’t distractions – they’re neurological rewiring disguised as small, doable acts. Sawyer emphasizes that healing is not linear; she had days where she felt strong and days where she cried on the gym floor convinced she hadn’t moved forward at all. But by the eleven-week mark, which research shows is when most people begin feeling lighter, she could feel the old emotional circuitry fading. She wasn’t living for him anymore, which meant she finally had space to live for herself. Mel adds that this is exactly why “the spark” often misleads us and why real love is built on admiration and consideration – things that take time to recognize. Healing recalibrates your sense of safety so you don’t search for intensity as proof of connection.

Choosing Yourself, Even When It Hurts

What threads through every part of this episode is a gentle but firm insistence on reclaiming your power. Whether it’s Tim still posting for his ex or Yuna trying to date too soon, Mel returns again and again to the truth that most of us stay stuck because we haven’t fully accepted reality. You can’t move forward while living inside a story you’re still rewriting. Mel reminds listeners that letting go doesn’t mean you stop caring; it means you stop abandoning yourself to care for someone who is no longer choosing you. There’s unexpected relief in hearing someone name the thing you’ve been too scared to admit – that heartbreak is not evidence you weren’t enough but evidence that you gave your heart to the wrong future. And once you understand the difference, self-respect becomes a quieter, steadier instinct.

Conclusion

This episode is ultimately a love letter to anyone who’s ever tried to heal while their heart still had its hands around the past. Mel and Sawyer don’t offer shortcuts because there aren’t any. Instead, they offer clarity, honesty, tools, and timeframes that make the process survivable. They show that grief is not evidence of failure but proof of connection, and that letting go is less about strength and more about finally stepping out of the fantasy you kept feeding because the truth felt too sharp. The greatest reassurance is simple: you are not alone, this pain is not permanent, and your life is not behind you. The kind of connection you want – the kind that Thinking of You was built to protect long before people reach this point – is still possible. And the version of you who will receive it is already being shaped by the heartbreak you’re walking through now.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #breakuphealing, #melrobbins, #heartbreakrecovery, #letThemTheory, #attachmentwounds, #healingafterlove

Understanding Misinterpretations Between Men and Women

Alison Armstrong opens by explaining that most relationship tension isn’t caused by malice but by misunderstanding — specifically, how women misread men and how men misread women. Women often assume men operate emotionally the way women do, and men assume women are responding to logic the way men do. The result is friction that feels personal but is actually biological, instinctive, and often predictable. Armstrong points out that women are wired to monitor safety through connection, while men derive security from facts, achievement, and clarity. This mismatch creates situations where women expect men to read hints as requests and men expect women to communicate directly — and both sides feel let down when the other misses the invisible script.

What Men Actually Need but Rarely Say Out Loud

One of Armstrong’s most striking ideas is that men thrive on being needed, useful, and admired. Not praised artificially, but genuinely received for what they naturally offer. Appreciation, she argues, is “oxygen” for men. They feel most bonded to a woman when they can make her life better in a tangible way, and they feel most defeated when their contributions are dismissed or treated as unnecessary. Modern hyper-independence — especially among high-achieving women — signals to men that there’s no place for them, no way to win. When a man stops offering, Armstrong says, it’s rarely because he stopped caring. It’s because his efforts were trained out of him.

The Traits That Make a Woman Irresistibly Charming

Armstrong breaks down the four qualities that make women uniquely magnetic to men: self-confidence, authenticity, passion, and receptivity. The first three inspire a man to want to give, but receptivity is the one that allows giving to actually happen. It tells a man, “There’s room for you here. What you offer matters.” She contrasts this with many women’s default pattern of minimizing their needs or rejecting help to prove capability. Ironically, this erases the very dynamic women crave — a partner who steps up, provides support, and brings out their softer side. True charm, in Armstrong’s framing, isn’t performative; it’s the natural glow that appears when a woman is connected to who she is.

How Women Accidentally Emasculate the Men They Love

Armstrong doesn’t shy away from the hard truth: women often bring out the worst in men through criticism, correction, and subtle comparisons. Men choose long-term partners largely on practical criteria — including whether she likes him, whether he believes he can make her happy, and whether she refrains from emasculating him “too much.” That threshold varies depending on a man’s stage of development, but the principle is universal. When a woman consistently points out how he’s doing things wrong — whether it’s a dishwasher arrangement or a life decision — she unintentionally attacks his strengths instead of honoring their complementarity. Men aren’t looking for a duplicate version of themselves; they’re looking for someone whose strengths expand their world, the way a great teammate elevates the whole game.

The Real Difference Between Surrender and Submission

Armstrong draws an important distinction between submission and surrender. Submission feels forced, transactional, or resentful — the classic “fine, you decide” energy. Surrender, in her language, is voluntary. It’s grounded in trust and earned security. But women often struggle to surrender because they equate needing something with weakness or immaturity. Armstrong explains that women often categorize their needs on a spectrum from “weak and pathetic” to “entitled and deserved,” and most never make it into language. If she can’t accept her own needs, she can’t express them — and if she can’t express them, a man can’t possibly meet them. That’s where trust breaks down, long before either partner realizes it.

Why Men Stop Telling the Truth

A recurring theme is how men are trained — often by the women they love — to stop revealing what’s real for them. When a man shares something vulnerable and receives disapproval, emotional punishment, or the information gets leaked to others, he internalizes a simple lesson: don’t tell her that again. Women may think transparency gives them power or closeness, but for men it becomes a liability. Armstrong notes that men tell the truth about things that don’t matter because it’s safe, while the deeper truths get locked away. Reversing that pattern requires a woman to receive honesty without trying to correct, fix, or reshape the man into her ideal.

How Polarity Flourishes Through Complementary Strengths

The heart of Armstrong’s framework is that men and women represent different — not competing — forms of strength. A woman’s femininity isn’t submissiveness; it’s a power that emerges when she feels protected, received, and valued. A man’s masculine drive isn’t dominance; it’s purpose expressed through providing, solving, and creating security. When each partner admires the other’s strengths instead of expecting sameness, relationships regain their natural polarity: two people who enhance each other rather than cancel each other out. This is where admiration, safety, and desire all intersect.

Conclusion

Armstrong ultimately argues that relationships thrive when both people feel needed, trusted, and free to be who they are instead of who modern culture says they should be. Men open up when they’re received rather than corrected. Women soften when they feel safe rather than self-sufficient. And both partners flourish when they understand the instincts that drive the other. It’s a dynamic that mirrors the intention behind Thinking of You — a space where people are encouraged to express needs, offer appreciation, and build connection through understanding rather than assumption. When couples work with each other’s wiring instead of fighting it, the relationship becomes something expansive, not exhausting.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #alisonarmstrong, #datingwisdom, #emotionalintelligence, #relationshipdynamics, #understandingmen

Why So Many Men Are Silently Struggling
A huge part of this conversation lands with a kind of quiet punch: so many boys and men are carrying a level of emotional exhaustion that no one sees. Jason Wilson explains that what looks like apathy, anger, or distance is often just a lifetime of being told to be strong, be stoic, be useful — but never human. From childhood onward, boys learn that expressing real fear or sadness makes them weak, so those emotions get buried. Over time, that internal weight turns into the very behaviors people misinterpret: the short fuse, the blank stare, the “I’m fine.” And while men keep performing their roles, their sense of worth shrinks because they’ve been taught it lives in what they produce, not in who they are.

The Hidden Cost of Emotional Suppression
Jason lays out something most men never say aloud: when they say they’re “tired,” they don’t mean they need sleep — they mean they need rest. Not the physical kind, but the soul-level release that comes from no longer carrying it all alone. He shares how men learn to survive by suppressing everything that feels vulnerable, but that suppression doesn’t go away; it leaks out as anger, numbness, or emotional absence. And when the world praises a man only for his utility — how hard he works, how much he provides, how much he can endure — he stops believing he’s valued simply for being himself. That’s where hopelessness begins. It’s also why so many men struggle to open up: they don’t think anyone wants the truth. They think people only want the strong version of them, not the hurting one.

What Men Actually Need But Rarely Ask For
For all the complexity around male behavior, Jason boils the need down to something simple: men want to be understood. They want to express something deeper than anger without being dismissed or shamed. They want someone to ask how they’re really doing and actually wait for the answer. And they want permission — maybe for the first time — to feel. When a man senses that he won’t be judged for showing fear, sadness, or tenderness, something profound happens: the anger softens. The silence breaks. The armor cracks just enough for connection to get in. Jason shows this in his work with boys at the Cave of Adullam, where martial arts becomes a doorway to emotional honesty. The boys don’t just learn discipline; they learn to breathe, name what’s going on underneath the surface, and release the pain they’ve been carrying for years.

How Loved Ones Can Create the Space Men Need
This part of the conversation feels especially important: the people who love men often want to help, but don’t know how to reach them. Jason offers a simple starting point — stop asking, “How was your day?” and start asking, “How are you… really?” Look them in the eyes. Slow down. Don’t rush to fix their emotions or reframe their reality. Men are conditioned to feel like burdens, so the moment a woman says, “It’s not that bad,” or tries to cheerlead them out of their feelings, they shut down again. Jason suggests creating presence instead of pressure: sit in the room with them without pushing them to talk. Touch their shoulder. Hold their hands. Let your presence say what words can’t. Because when a man finally risks sharing something vulnerable, the most painful thing you can do is dismiss it. The most healing thing you can do is honor it.

The Path Forward for Men Who Want to Change
Jason doesn’t sugarcoat the truth: becoming emotionally whole takes courage. It requires a man to revisit the places he’s been avoiding — old trauma, unmet needs, father wounds, moments where he felt small or unwanted. But he argues that this is the real warrior work. Facing yourself is harder than fighting the world. And the reward is freedom — the ability to show up as a comprehensive man rather than a one-dimensional one. A man who can be strong and soft. Protective and vulnerable. Driven and rested. Self-controlled instead of explosive. And most importantly, a man who knows his worth isn’t defined by productivity, but by his humanity. That shift changes marriages, fatherhood, friendships, and the entire emotional climate around him.

Conclusion
What makes this conversation powerful is how ordinary and universal it is. Jason Wilson isn’t describing a rare crisis — he’s naming a truth most men live with daily but rarely articulate. And he’s offering a language for women who want to support them, not criticize them. At its core, this episode is about connection — the same thing the Thinking of You app tries to facilitate in its own way. It’s a reminder that when men feel safe, they open. When they feel understood, they soften. When they’re allowed to be human, they heal. And when they heal, every relationship around them gets stronger.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #mensmentalhealth, #healingformen, #emotionalwellbeing, #jasonwilson, #melrobbins, #mentalhealthawareness

Mindset – Rewriting the Story You Tell Yourself

Francesca Hogi begins by reframing true love as an inside-out process rather than a search for a perfect person. She argues that cultural myths, especially the fantasy of “the one,” distort expectations and keep people chasing an illusion instead of building the relational skills that make love workable. Mindset determines how you interpret romantic experiences, whether you see dating as a hopeless grind or as a series of opportunities to practice presence, curiosity, and growth. When people shift from passive hoping to intentional participation, their love lives often open up quickly because they stop outsourcing their agency and start examining the unconscious beliefs shaping their patterns. This shift parallels the philosophy behind Thinking of You, where daily rituals and mindful communication strengthen secure relational habits.

Heartset – Unlearning People-Pleasing and Expanding Self-Worth

Hogi emphasizes that many daters, especially women conditioned to be “chosen,” struggle because they approach connection through the lens of palatability rather than authenticity. Heartset work means understanding your emotional wiring, identifying long-held limiting beliefs, and recognizing where perfectionism or fear of rejection narrows your openness to genuine intimacy. She describes the sneaky ways low self-worth blocks receptivity to love, even when someone consciously believes they are deserving. Through guided self-inquiry (“heart work”), she helps people bring unconscious fears to light so they can update outdated narratives. As heartset strengthens, emotional resilience grows, making it easier to stay grounded, communicate needs, and build intimacy without urgency or attachment to specific outcomes.

Soulset – Surrender, Intuition, and Romantic Energy

In Hogi’s framework, soulset is the most overlooked dimension of finding love. It includes surrendering the need to control timing, reconnecting with intuition, believing in abundance rather than scarcity, and trusting that love is meant for you. She argues that people sabotage themselves by insisting they know how their love story “should” unfold, missing moments of serendipity that intuition quietly signals. Soulset invites gratitude, presence, and intentional romantic energy – the spark that arises when you move through the world open to possibility. This openness includes the “meet cute mindset,” the belief that every outing holds potential for connection. It’s a mindset and an energetic posture: earbuds out, eyes lifted, attuned to the humans around you. The Thinking of You app reflects this same principle of continual relational energy, turning daily interactions into meaningful rituals that keep connection alive.

Skillset – Flirting, Curiosity, and the Art of Creating Chemistry

The final pillar turns dating into a learnable skill. Hogi reframes flirting as intentional human warmth – making someone feel seen, special, and acknowledged. She explains that chemistry is not something mystical you either have or don’t; it is co-created, often through eye contact, presence, genuine compliments, and curiosity. She encourages daters to stop waiting for the other person to initiate and to use bold but grounded moves, such as asking open-ended questions or offering a sincere observation. Even on dating apps, vulnerability shows up through unfiltered photos and truth-based profiles instead of curated personas. Because authenticity is magnetic, Hogi warns that attempts to appeal to everyone flatten individuality and reduce relational compatibility. Using more thoughtful prompts and real conversation starters – much like the intentional daily questions in Thinking of You – helps connection unfold more naturally.

Breaking Patterns – Why Rejection Is Guidance

Hogi urges daters to see rejection as redirection rather than proof of inadequacy. She explains that many people repeatedly recreate unhealthy relationships because they select partners who match their familiar wounds, not their future selves. When you stop performing, stop rushing, and stop interpreting rejection as failure, your dating life becomes less volatile and more grounded. Calm replaces urgency, clarity replaces fantasy, and you begin choosing partners based on mutual alignment rather than old emotional scripts. She emphasizes that discernment during early communication is crucial: you can avoid most “bad dates” by being honest about your needs, setting boundaries, and paying attention to whether someone shows enthusiasm, respect, and reciprocity before you ever meet in person.

Real-World Application – Dating Without Burnout

Hogi critiques dating apps for commodifying people and misaligning incentives; they profit when you don’t find love. She encourages a hybrid strategy: use apps intentionally but prioritize in-person interaction, serendipity, and expanding your social environments. She also advises daters to prepare a handful of thoughtful questions that spark delight, playfulness, or meaningful conversation, because the quality of questions often determines the quality of connection. Whether dating or in a long-term partnership, she stresses the importance of flirting, novelty, scanning for the positive, and reinforcing emotional safety – practices that keep relationships vibrant rather than stagnant. Tools that encourage small daily touchpoints, like Thinking of You, help maintain these habits by making connection consistent, intentional, and emotionally attuned.

Conclusion

Francesca Hogi’s message is ultimately one of empowerment: true love becomes inevitable when you align your mindset, heartset, soulset, and skillset. This alignment dissolves scarcity, strengthens intuition, deepens vulnerability, and transforms dating from a fear-driven performance into an embodied practice of authentic relating. By embracing curiosity, intentionality, and human warmth – the same qualities reinforced by daily rituals of connection – you create the internal conditions where love can recognize you as much as you recognize it. In this sense, love is not something you find; it is something you become available for, one intentional moment at a time.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #selfworthjourney, #authenticlove, #intentionaldating, #datingskills, #emotionalconnection, #findtruelove

The Hidden Cost of Living in Chronic Stress

Mel Robbins and Chris Williamson argue that most people misunderstand why they feel stuck, overwhelmed, or incapable of change. It is not weakness or lack of discipline but the reality that more than 80% of adults are unknowingly living in chronic stress, leaving their amygdala running the show. Robbins explains that the pandemic hard-wired many into perpetual threat mode, turning ordinary interactions into triggers and disconnecting people from their prefrontal cortex, which governs reason, planning, and emotional control. This state amplifies anxiety and makes simple decisions feel overwhelming. Her message is that you cannot think or shame yourself out of this biology – you must first understand the system and change the internal settings that keep your brain bracing for impact.

Why Anxiety Is Separation from Self

A central revelation comes from Dr. Russell Kennedy’s idea that all anxiety is a form of separation anxiety – not from others but from your own capacity. Robbins explains that anxiety begins the moment you catastrophize what might happen and disconnect from the truth that you can handle difficulty. The mind leaps into "what if," doubling down on fear and self-doubt, creating an internal split. Robbins teaches that the first step is to return to the present moment, drop back into the body, and ground yourself in what is real rather than imagined. This shift allows you to replace spiraling thoughts with the deeper truth she emphasizes repeatedly: through attitude and action, you can navigate even the hardest moments. It is a skill of returning to yourself rather than abandoning yourself when fear arises.

Understanding the Illusion of Control and Its Impact on Stress

Robbins and Williamson dive deeply into why people cling to control even though it makes them miserable. They describe compensatory control – the tendency to assign meaning, blame, or patterns to random events as a way to feel less helpless. The modern world intensifies this reflex: constant information streams imply that everything should be knowable and predictable, but life remains largely uncontrollable. This mismatch fuels anxiety. Robbins highlights that the illusion of control is more stressful than actual uncertainty because it tricks people into believing they should have power over things they cannot influence. Her tools shift the focus back to the only three things we ever truly control: what we think, what we do, and how we respond.

Tools for Reclaiming Emotional Authority

Robbins insists that emotional mastery is built through tools, not feelings. Motivation, she says, is unreliable because the brain is wired to avoid discomfort. True change requires systems that override emotional resistance. Her “Let Them / Let Me” framework is one of these systems. “Let Them” is a cue to release the fantasy that you can control others’ behavior, expectations, or emotional states. “Let Me” redirects your attention inward, toward the response you choose based on your values rather than reactivity. Robbins frames this as radical personal responsibility – not self-blame but the power to decide how to show up regardless of external chaos. This framework frees mental space, reduces conflict, and helps people stay grounded in their identity even when others behave in ways that are frustrating or unpredictable.

The Path from Self-Criticism to Self-Compassion

Robbins reflects on years of being hard on herself, driving toward accomplishments through fear and self-punishment. She admits this slowed her progress and drained her resilience. Self-compassion, she argues, is not indulgence but fuel – the difference between creating momentum and constantly wrecking your own confidence. Instead of magnifying flaws, Robbins encourages acknowledging small wins, reinforcing positive behavior, and treating yourself with the same generosity you extend to those you love. This shift aligns with relationship practices emphasized in the Thinking of You app, where daily check-ins and thoughtful communication reinforce safety, support, and emotional awareness rather than criticism or avoidance.

Recognizing Childhood Patterns That Shape Adult Identity

A powerful segment of the conversation addresses childhood attribution. As Dr. Paul Conti explains, children cannot attribute adult behavior to adult problems. When a parent is stressed, angry, chaotic, or inconsistent, the child assumes they are the cause. This developmental limitation plants lifelong beliefs such as “I did something wrong,” “someone is mad at me,” or “I must stay hyper-vigilant to feel safe.” Robbins reveals she carried these patterns into adulthood, always feeling she was disappointing someone. Williamson echoes the same feeling. Understanding these early mental imprints allows adults to question whether the belief still serves them and adjust the underlying setting. This self-awareness becomes a gateway into healthier emotional regulation and more secure relationships.

Choosing the Right Partner and Understanding Compatibility

Robbins emphasizes that most people do not fall in love with who someone is but with who they hope that person might become. This disconnect leads to relationships sustained by fantasy rather than compatibility. Real partnership requires accepting someone as they are – not who you want them to be. Robbins points to research from the Gottman Institute showing that 69% of relationship conflicts never change. The true deal breakers are mismatches in values, dreams, or life direction. She encourages choosing partners who feel like home base – where you can speak openly, sit in silence, and feel emotionally safe. This echoes the core philosophy behind Thinking of You: deep connection grows through everyday honesty and emotional presence, not performance or potential.

Conclusion

Robbins ends by reminding us that confidence is not a feeling but the result of actions that prove you can handle life as it unfolds. You will never eliminate uncertainty, chaos, or discomfort, but you can learn to trust yourself in the face of them. Emotional authority comes from intentional responses, compassionate self-talk, clear boundaries, and awareness of old patterns that no longer serve you. Whether in relationships, career decisions, or moments of fear, the real transformation comes from choosing alignment over avoidance. You will be okay no matter what happens – a truth that becomes stronger each time you act in accordance with who you want to become.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #MelRobbins, #ChrisWilliamson, #impostorsyndrome, #emotionalregulation, #selftrust, #personalgrowth

The Stories You Tell Yourself Shape Everything
Lori Gottlieb begins by explaining that nearly all stuckness originates in the stories we unconsciously repeat about who we are and what life means. These narratives often come from childhood experiences, parental labels, or early relational wounds. Over time, we forget they were ever interpretations and start treating them as facts. Whether it’s “I’m too sensitive,” “I’m not good enough,” or “People always let me down,” these beliefs quietly script how we act, what we tolerate, and how we interpret every interaction. Gottlieb argues that we don’t become trapped because circumstances are immovable but because we keep telling the same outdated chapter. When we revisit and revise those narratives with accuracy, compassion, and curiosity, new possibilities open. This directly mirrors the reflective, pattern-revealing rituals built into the Thinking of You app, which help couples and individuals recognize how their internal stories influence their connections.

Why We Blame Other People for Our Problems
Gottlieb highlights that most people want change but want someone else to make it happen. Partners, parents, coworkers, or friends become the villains of our narrative. But change rarely comes from rearranging the external world. Using the metaphor of a dance, she explains that every relational dynamic has choreography. If you adjust your steps, the other person must either adapt or step off the floor. Transformation begins when you shift your patterns rather than trying to rewrite someone else’s behavior. Even difficult people have their own stories that explain their actions; seeing that complexity allows us to respond instead of react. It’s a reminder that emotional maturity means taking responsibility for your part in the dance and examining the internal narratives driving your responses.

How Old Wounds Create Big Reactions in the Present
A central tool Gottlieb offers is the phrase “If it’s hysterical, it’s historical.” When a reaction feels disproportionately intense, it’s a sign that the present moment has activated an older story. The partner who forgets a chore may tap into your childhood fear of being unseen. A delayed text may awaken an old abandonment wound. The goal is not to suppress the reaction but to ask two questions: Does this feel familiar, and what can I do differently as an adult? By separating the current moment from the past moment your nervous system is reliving, you regain clarity and agency. This approach helps individuals interpret their emotions accurately rather than catastrophically, and it mirrors the grounding, self-regulating benefits couples experience when they use daily check-ins and prompts inside Thinking of You.

Editing Your Narrative With Curiosity Instead of Criticism
To rewrite your story, Gottlieb recommends looking for counter-examples. The human mind selectively gathers evidence to support its painful beliefs, overlooking the nuanced reality that contradicts them. If your story is “I can’t trust anyone,” name one person you have trusted. If your story is “I’m never good enough,” list moments where you succeeded. Even small examples begin to break the illusion of absolutes. Gottlieb also teaches the three-part test for thoughts: Is it kind? Is it true? Is it useful? If a belief fails any of those criteria, it does not belong in your narrative. She emphasizes that self-talk should be examined the same way a therapist examines a client’s worldview: with precision, compassion, and an insistence on accuracy.

Why Change Feels Hard Even When It’s Good
Change requires loss, Gottlieb says, because even unhealthy patterns feel familiar. We cling to the known because the misery of uncertainty often feels worse than the certainty of misery. This is why people stay in stagnant relationships, avoid difficult conversations, or resist taking steps they know would improve their lives. Familiarity feels safe, even when it is limiting. Gottlieb uses the metaphor of a prisoner shaking the bars of a cage without realizing the sides are open. Walking around the bars gives you freedom, but it also requires responsibility. The first step toward lasting change is acknowledging both the gain and the grief, allowing the old pattern to loosen its grip. With intention, a new chapter becomes possible.

Relationships as Owner’s Manuals for Connection
Gottlieb explains that partners continuously hand each other an “owner’s manual” for what makes them feel loved, calm, respected, or connected. The problem is that most people ignore it. Your partner’s needs are not always your needs, and what soothes one person may overwhelm another. Understanding how they operate requires curiosity rather than assumption. Gottlieb emphasizes that conflict is not evidence of incompatibility but a sign of misread instructions. Clear requests, not complaints, move relationships forward. This echoes the philosophy behind Thinking of You, which helps couples communicate in ways that reveal emotional needs rather than triggering old defenses.

Boundaries That Actually Work
One of the most misunderstood elements of personal growth is boundaries. Gottlieb clarifies that boundaries are not rules you impose on someone else but actions you commit to taking yourself. If you ask someone not to yell and they do, the boundary is your response: “I’m going to step away and return when we can talk calmly.” Boundaries must be consistent to be effective. They are not punishments but self-respect in practice. They also require self-awareness, because sometimes the boundary we want to set is unrealistic or rooted in our unexamined story rather than reality.

Conclusion
Lori Gottlieb’s core message is that you are the author of your life, and rewriting your story begins with editing one sentence. By questioning outdated narratives, recognizing emotional patterns, taking responsibility for your part in relational dynamics, and grounding yourself in present-moment truth, you create a new trajectory. Every small shift becomes a new paragraph, and every new paragraph becomes a life written with intention rather than repetition. This is the same principle behind the Thinking of You app: transformation through daily awareness, compassionate communication, and the steady rewriting of what connection can be. Your story is yours to write, starting now.

#thinkingofyou, #thinkingofyouapp, #relationshipapp, #couplesapp, #melrobbins, #lorigottlieb, #getunstuck, #selfreflectiontools, #emotionalgrowth, #rewritingyourstory